| |
Residents
Fear Expiration of Housing Program
By Gabriel Rodriguez-Nava
or
more than 20 years, Roosevelt Island's affordable housing has
attracted a wide variety of residents from many countries and backgrounds.
The island's ethnic, cultural and social diversity has tinted its
community life with a sense of small town cosmopolitanism. However,
the happy marriage between low rents and decent housing on Roosevelt
Island may soon go down the river. And with it, several residents
fear, so will the island's characteristic diversity.
Out
of 3,000 apartments on Roosevelt Island, only 900 charge market-rate
rents. The rest are government-subsidized buildings or developments
built under the Mitchell-Lama
housing program, with one building as a co-op. Passed by the New
York legislature in 1955, this program offered developers low-interest
mortgages and tax abatements in exchange of rent caps (landlords
can only increases rent if profits fall below six percent.)
But
at the same time, the Private Housing Finance Law allows owners
to take their buildings off the Mitchell-Lama program after 20 years
by repaying the mortgage and complying with a number of procedural
requirements.
or
decades, the possibility of building owners opting out of Mitchell-Lama
was not a serious concern for Roosevelt Island residents. Yet as
two of the four core residential developments in the island crossed
the 20-year mark in the late 1990s, several residents began to worry.
Since
1998, Manhattan has lost 2,724 units of affordable housing, according
to the Office of Land Use, Housing and Development appointed by
Manhattan Borough President Virgina Fields. Nearly 6,000 units belong
to owners who had already applied to opt out of Mitchell-Lama.
National
trends are not encouraging to Roosevelt Islanders either. In a report
released by the National Alliance of Housing and Urban Development
Tenants, an organization representing 2.1 million families nationwide,
more than 250,000 units of affordable housing have been lost since
1996. This occurred "following Congress' restoration of owner's
ability to 'prepay' (i.e. pay off after 20 years) their 40 year
HUD-subsidized mortgages and raise rents to high market levels,"
testified Ms. Louis Sanchez, president of NAHT, during a Capitol
Hill hearing on October 2002.
"They're
trying to turn this into a 'rich club' island," said Julie
Palermo, president of Roosevelt Island's Chamber of Commerce and
owner of Julie's Sports Bar, the only bar on the island. Palermo
recalled a time when her son Johnny was six-years-old and she found
him playing in his room with friends from Africa, Germany and Israel.
"This
is what America is all about, I thought to myself, and this is where
I want my kid to grow up until he's 18," said Palermo. However,
she fears that if rents start to go up, the social diversity in
which she wants Johnny to grow up will swiftly start to dwindle.
"Sure, my business would benefit from wealthier clients, but
what good would that be if I would still have to move out because
I couldn't possibly afford to pay market rate?"
Mathew
Katz, president of the Roosevelt
Island Residents Association, estimates that of the 9,500 people
living on the island, around 7,500 live in Mitchell-Lama or other
government-subsidized housing. "This is a planned community,
designed from the beginning to host a mix of housing and parks and
to be economically and socially diverse," said Katz. "If
these buildings start going private, our community will be destroyed."
hat
community is a warm, welcoming one. Unlike the rest of the city,
the pace here is much slower; people greet each other on the street
and store owners refer to customers by their name. Main Street,
with its non-threatening buildings, frequent courtyards and green
spaces, offers a sense of urban coziness that, together with the
river breeze, gives the island a resort-like quality. It's the perfect
setting for celebrating Roosevelt Island Day on June 14th, when
residents go out and plant flowers everywhere, enjoy a free breakfast
provided by the Residents Association and participate in several
community activities and public concerts. <Click here to take
a photo tour of the island
This
kind of atmosphere is what has kept globetrotter and Boy Scout Master
Geoffrey Kerr on the island for 25 years. "Roosevelt Island
is a wonderful cross between the city and the suburbs. You're away
from all the hustle and bustle but you're five minutes away from
Bloomingdale's," said Kerr in his British accent. "It's
also a very diverse place, one where the poor hobnob with the well-off,
etc. But if rents aren't kept affordable, this will change the nature
of the community, it would become more like an [Upper] East Side
community."
However,
for this to take place on Roosevelt Island, Mitchell-Lama building
owners must take action. Most important is obtaining a ground lease
extension. In 1969, New York State's Urban Development Corporation
leased the island from the City of New York for 99 years. This means
that landlords would have to negotiate their ground lease extension
with the Roosevelt
Island Operating Cooperation (RIOC), a nine-member board appointed
by the governor that functions as the island's governing body.
Dick
Lutz, publisher of the Main
Street WIRE, explained that the RIOC holds a key role in
determining the conditions under which building owners decide to
opt out of the Mitchell-Lama program. In Roosevelt Island's only
newspaper, Lutz outlined two possible, though extreme, scenarios.
One: RIOC grants the lease extension but asks for rent protections.
Or two: RIOC extends leases to building owners but asks a) for lots
of cash upfront, or b) for a high annual ground rate.
At
present, however, it is difficult to estimate how the RIOC will
deal with this matter. Thanks to the Maple Tree Group, a group of
islanders seeking self-governance for Roosevelt Island, the majority
of RIOC board members will now have to be residents. The members
won't be elected by other residents, they will still be appointed
by the governor. But so far, Governor George E. Pataki has failed
to do so.
nother
nagging question surrounding the Mitchell-Lama buildings is the
issue of fairness. One common argument of developers is that they
would have never built under the Mitchell-Lama program without the
provision to opt out of it after 20 years. Also at risk, according
to developers, is the public's trust in governmental policies if
the guarantees provided by the Private Housing Finance Law are not
respected.
To
this, Lutz responded that "this point of view certainly has
validity. I'm not at all sure it's right to change the rules of
the game just because the game is nearly over. In an ideal world,
the low-cost housing unit going out of Mitchell-Lama now would have
been steadily replaced over the years so that the supply would remain
more or less steady," he wrote in an e-mail. "It's a very
difficult balancing act between the rights of the owners and the
needs of the tenants, with questions about the reliability of state
guarantees thrown in for good measure."
In
the meantime, Katz and his association are busy trying to sign up
residents for a rally to Albany, where they intend to show mass
support for a Senate bill that would extend rent-control laws for
expired Mitchell-Lama buildings. Nevertheless, Katz was at best
unsure about residents' participation. In his view, there's not
enough awareness of the issue. "It's difficult to motivate
people here," he said.
But
as Dolores Green, president of Roosevelt Island Senior Association,
suggested, this may have to do more with denial than with motivation.
"To be perfectly honest, I think we're not discussing Mitchell-Lama
because we're terribly afraid," she said. "It's like,
in our heads, we won't live to see it happen. Seniors live with
fixed incomes, and the prospect is very traumatic."
To
Top
|